Reflection on the four years since partner's stroke

I have spent the past four years since my partner suffered a brain bleed (from which she recovered very well) battling planned and deliberate government corruption to do with the guardianship racket, a criminal cabal focussed on denying any semblance of human rights and involving  non-constitutionally legitimate kangaroo tribunals, the Office of the Public Guardian and the Office of the Public Trustee (including comparable entities in other states.

Anyone hospitalised with a brain injury is at risk of being referred to a kangaroo tribunal (VCAT, NCAT, QCT etc). Typically these referrals take place within days of admission when the patient is in the acute stage and least able to speak for themselves. The official policy in most hospitals prohibits any formal assessment within thirty days however the spotters (often social workers) have no interest in policy, they simply want the cash they are paid by the Office of the Public Trustee for a successful referral. This insidious organization can afford to reward its spotters as it stands to plunder the whole estate of a victim. Occasionally referrals to the kangaroo tribunal involve a deluded family member who believes they will get control of the victim's estate, however that never happens in Queensland and only very rarely happens in other states.  Don't even think about an enduring power of attorney protecting the victim's interests as kangaroo tribunals routinely over-ride them with no evidence of malpractice.

This Queensland version of the racket was conceived by at least two ALP ex Attorneys General with full complicity of their LNP counterparts and the object is plunder the estates of victims in order to prop up the financially and morally bankrupt government.  The guardianship racket is big business, across Australia, at least half a trillion dollars per annum is being embezzled from victims.  Among other issues, kangaroo courts demonize and destroy families / support networks to de-activate / remove all opposition. In case anyone gets on their soapbox and starts on about conspiracy theories, everything I say is documented and can be proven. My own personal involvement entailed interaction with and assistance from the United Nations Human Rights Commission and the International Criminal Court. I believe I am the only Australian citizen who has secured ICC intervention in an Australian matter.  Owing to the psychological injuries inflicted by kangaroo tribunals on both victims and their supporters, it is unlikely that anyone close to a guardianship racket matter could emerge without being profoundly damaged. Even a decisive landmark victory (which we achieved) doesn’t compensate for the psychological damage sustained in the kangaroo tribunal.

My advocacy efforts include ongoing approaches to state and commonwealth politicians, watchdogs, churches, public interest organizations, media entities  yadda yadda yadda  (most of which are generally useless for various reasons), and international human rights organizations which quite frankly is where the rubber meet the road in this field. Queensland Attorney General D’Ath may well have introduced a (duplicitious) Human Rights Bill to state parliament but if enacted, its only effect will be to further degrade what precious few human rights Queenslanders enjoy. Comparable legislation has already been enacted in the ACT and Victoria and in both cases it has reduced rather than enhanced human rights.

In dealing with muppetdom, I’ve found it necessary to come to grips with a cross-section of legislation. An issue I discovered some time ago is that all Australian governments play fast and loose with legislation which I suggest is a deliberate ploy to protect THEM against US.  Legislation is formulated by bureaucracies rather than relevant ministers (who probably have no idea what is in a Bill).  Acts created to control the people go to great lengths to detail penalties and recourse. For example the Transport Operations – Road Use Management Act  1995 runs to over 500 pages, half of which is about ways the muppets can punish / penalize us.  On the other hand, legislation purportedly devised to control THEM, including the Public Service Act 2008 (which provides that all department, quangos etc must have an internal complaint review facility), the QCAT Act 2009, the Guardianship and Administration Act 2010, and the Local Government Act 2009 are totally devoid of any mention of recourse / penalties for non-compliance.  Not only does legislation fail to provide remedies, but muppets are endowed with immunities, and the principle of separation of powers is a con which serves only to delude the masses into believing there is somewhere to go when a member of the legislature, bureaucracy or judiciary do the wrong thing. In reality, all these muppets including the High Court work together to protect each other.  The media must be considered part of the establishment club as no hard copy or electronic media company in Australia is prepared to expose the guardianship racket.

 So where does this all lead.  Basically I’ve concluded that official corruption is not accidental by has been deliberately and intentionally created, mostly for financial reasons. The number of obstacles to securing justice leave no doubt that corruption was premeditated. All watchdogs including the utterly farcical Crime Cover-up Commission were conceived purely to sweep malpractice under the carpet, and even when the volume of public complaints forces a Royal Commission, terms of reference and policies invariably protect the guilty. The FSRC is chaired by a retired High Court judge whose decisions were invariably ‘pro-establishment’,  and the latest Royal Commission is also demonstrably a sham. Personally I wouldn’t trust Bronwen Bishop to be impartial.

 

All that aside, I do believe it is possible to overcome the obstacles, but doing so will necessitate some very unconventional / innovative approaches. Quite obviously the powers that be have been able to access considerable professional expertise in creating the immunities, protections and lack of accountabilities, consequently it is inconceivable that normal political, legal / judicial or mainstream media publicity approaches will ever be successful. These are all too obvious and all possible effort would have been expended to ensure they will go nowhere. Apart from orchestrating one of the three landmark victories in QCAT,  I have been instrumental in getting the long term queen of QCAT Clare Endicott demoted and her protégé Peta Stilgoe banished to the Land Court (yes well) but no thanks to the legal / judicial circus or the media.  Thinking outside the box was one of the most important factors in the above wins, another was a pathological obsession with winning, regardless of the obstacles placed in my way.  I’ve long lost count of the number of guardianship racket victims who have approached me and been told that without an all-consuming obsession, they should save themselves the aggro and simply give in now.